As hydrogen fuel cells become ever more prevalent, the consumer base they reach becomes broader and broader. With any new technology, there are some misconceptions and prejudices that need to be overcome to enable widespread use. Because hydrogen fuel cells are indeed new for many consumers, there are prevailing myths surrounding their safety and viability. This article aims to dispel the myths surrounding hydrogen by providing basic information, and to show how hydrogen is, in fact, a safe energy source with its own distinct set of use cases.
As most articles about hydrogen power begin, the Hindenburg disaster will serve as a jumping off point here too. It is an image of fire ingrained in the minds of many, and it makes sense. The coverage of the disaster serves as the first (if not the only) exposure some people have to hydrogen. Because hydrogen has, until now, taken a minimal role in the average person’s life, this effects of this scary first exposure tend to manifest as the misconception that HFC powered cars are somehow more dangerous than petroleum powered cars. Not only is the Hindenburg disaster a completely different scenario than modern applications, but it was almost certainly caused by other factors apart from the hydrogen gas.
The dramatically improved safety of hydrogen is easily seen in how we store it. For instance, because hydrogen used for lift had to be in a gaseous, uncompressed state to do its job, the Hindenburg stored it in massive bladders made from cow intestine. These containment vessels were soft, lightweight, and easily punctured. Today, we no longer use hydrogen as a lifting gas, and virtually all applications require the hydrogen to be stored in compressed or even liquid form. PowerUP’s fuel cells, for instance, use hydrogen stored in insulated, protected cylinders such as the ones tested here. As you can see in the test, when these cylinders are dropped, there are no leaks, and the liquid hydrogen is contained safely.
Of course, there are times in which hydrogen does escape accidentally. When any combustible fuel leaks, ignition is possible. Hydrogen is no different. However, hydrogen leaks are far more difficult to create. This is due to the incredible strength of hydrogen containment vessels, which are often made from carbon fiber. Because these cylinders used to store hydrogen are so strong, they require incredible amounts of force to cause them to fail catastrophically. When the cylinders do fail, they typically leak from a small point, and the hydrogen escapes rapidly. Here, what sets hydrogen apart from petroleum fuels is the same characteristic that makes it a valuable lifting gas: Its lightness. Hydrogen, whether it combusts or not, shoots off into the atmosphere. According to Jacob Leachman, an associate professor at the University of Washington, hydrogen accelerates off into the atmosphere so quickly that it achieves escape velocity and leaves earth’s atmosphere entirely. When it does ignite, the flames still shoot straight up, and dissipate quickly. This is important because it prevents the fire from fully engulfing whatever structure or vehicle the HFC is a part of. Gasoline, on the other hand, pools below whatever vessel was holding it, or trickles and spreads before easily catching and burning. Though hydrogen is safer than you might expect, it is of course a dangerous substance, and should by no means be thought of as completely benign. Instead, it should be respected and handled safely in the same way fossil fuels are –this is a concept we have all been comfortable with for decades.
Another common myth of hydrogen is that it is “unproven”. This misconception is easily understood, as to the average consumer, hydrogen may seem like a totally new technology. After all, many consumers have never owned or driven an HFCV, or operated a device powered by a hydrogen fuel cell. A little skepticism towards new tech is normal, healthy, and should even be encouraged. However, with HFC’s, the technology is anything but new. They have been on the world’s roads in some form or another since 1966 with the Chevrolet Electrovan, and many forklifts across the globe are powered by HFC’s. Beyond automobiles, the HFC is used as a source of electricity in a much wider array of applications. They have been used as stationary generators for off-grid houses and infrastructure, in spacecraft such as the American Gemini missions, and even in small vehicles such as the currently available electric bicycles made by Pragma Mobility. These examples show not only the excellent scalability of the HFC, but the fact that they have been in use much longer than one might think, and without incident too.
Though this myth is less wide-spread, some think that hydrogen is not actually any better than fossil fuel based energy. Hydrogen gas is a substance that may be generated with a wide variety of methods, and these methods are color coded. Green, blue, black, brown, turquoise, yellow and white are the most common designations for hydrogen generation processes. From electrolysis to gasification and methane pyrolysis, there are many routes by which to generate hydrogen gas. Some are better than others. The best, of course, uses renewable energy to create the gas, while the worst use fossil fuels without any form of carbon capture. The hard fact is that hydrogen gas requires energy to create, and that energy must come from somewhere. As hydrogen becomes a more widespread source of energy, the generation of hydrogen gas will involve ever more renewable energy. The innovation has already occurred, there is only the implementation left to achieve.